Chronicle of the Animal Law reading group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36151/DALPS.047Keywords:
Animals, Sentience, Ethics, Continental Law, Legal Personality, Non-Human Animals, Plants, Animal LawAbstract
The Animal Law Reading Club aims to provide a forum for exploring and reflecting on the various ethical and legal dimensions of animal law through specialized literature addressing this issue. Its purpose is to foster constructive dialogue that contributes to raising awareness about the importance of legally protecting all animals. This chronicle presents the four sessions of the club and their outcomes. During these sessions, the following works were analyzed: “Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights” by Saskia Stucki, published in 2020 in the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies; “Animal. A Biojuridical Approach” by Marita Giménez-Candela, published in 2023 in Revista DALPS (Animal Law-Animal Legal and Policy Studies); “Can Animals Have Rights If They Cannot Incur Obligations? Animal Subjects and Citizens” by Silvina Pezzetta, published in 2023 in Mutatis Mutandis: International Journal of Philosophy; and “Plant Sentience? Between Romanticism and Denial: Science” by Miguel Segundo-Ortin and Paco Calvo, published in 2023 in Animal Sentience.
Downloads
References
DONALDSON, S. y KYMLICKA, W. Animals in Political Theory, en Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies (New York 2014) 43-64.
DONALDSON, S. y KYMLICKA, W. Unruly beasts: animal citizens and the threat of tyranny, en Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (2014) 23-45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43298176
DONALDSON, S. y KYMLICKA, W. Zoopolis. A Political Theory of Animal Rights (New York 2011).
GIMÉNEZ-CANDELA, M. Animal. Una aproximación biojurídica, en Revista DALPS (Derecho Animal - Animal Legal and Policy Studies) 1 (2023), 10-30. https://doi.org/10.36151/DALPS.001
KYMLICKA, W. y DONALDSON, S. Inclusive Citizenship Beyond the Capacity Contract, en The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship (Oxford 2017) 863-880.
PEZZETTA, S. ¿Pueden los animales tener derechos si no pueden contraer obligaciones? Animales sujetos y ciudadanos, en Mutatis Mutandis: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 20/1 (2023) 33-46. https://revistamutatismutandis.com/index.php/mutatismutandis/article/view/454
SEGUNDO-ORTIN, M. y CALVO, P. Plant sentience? Between romanticism and denial: Science, en Animal Sentience 33/1 (2023) 455. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol8/iss33/1/
STUCKI, S. One Rights: Human and Animal Rights in the Anthropocene (Cham 2023).
STUCKI, S. Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights, en Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40/3 (2020) 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 DALPS (Derecho Animal-Animal Legal and Policy Studies)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.